As far as my ethics go, I fall into both the Deontological (duty based) and Teleological (consequence based) theories. For the most part I follow the Deontological ethics. As a journalist, or soon to be journalist, I think it is important to deliver the story as it is without opinions or biases. I feel that is my duty as a journalist. If I use a quote in a story it should be exactly what the person said, not something I made up. I feel like it is very important to show both sides of a story, that is just the job of a journalist. As far as the Teleological theory goes I do think about the effect my actions will have on others. I think before I act. If I don't show both sides of a story I may be looked down upon or fired. If I misquote a source, I might loose that source forever.
This a glimpse into my ethics using the theories from Controversies in Media
Ethics. I hope you can use this explanation to help you find what theory fits your ethics.
I believe there is a little if each theory in a person, but one that is more dominant.
This website from the university of Davidson has more information and more
theories that may help you find your the theory behind your ethical behavior.
http://www.bio.davidson.edu/people/kabernd/Indep/carainbow/Theories.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment